Monday 25 April 2011

O'Brien's enemy?


Cardinal Keith O’Brien, head of the Catholic church in Scotland, thinks I am his “enemy” and accuses me, and like-minded people, of trying to “destroy” Christian heritage and “take God from the public square”.

Christian denominations need no help from atheists, secularists or believers in other theistic models to reduce the reach of their faith. Church attendance in the UK – surely a good barometer of people’s active adherence to the Christian faith – is declining, has been so for many years, and is predicted as continuing to decline.  In particular, younger generations are rejecting the belief system the Cardinal and his ilk peddle, with 75% of 15-29 year olds and 80% of under-15s not being “in the church” (http://www.christiantoday.com/article/researcher.anticipates.further.church.decline.in.2010s/25949.htm).

As with the many other theistic systems that have fallen by the way over the millennia, more and more people are seeing the myths of Christianity for the, at best, “nice parables and stories” that they are, and are no longer accepting the hypocrisies of organisations that claim to have the only moral framework for humanity whilst perpetrating systematic abuse (e.g. the papal directive that condoms should not be used in response to HIV – an example of an occasion when a church leader could have single-handedly enabled generations to avoid infection, but chose not to), and shielding multiple numbers of paedophiles who used their positions of “moral authority” to demolish the very innocence they preached whilst often leaving the abused feeling somehow responsible for their abuser’s actions. And Pope John Paul II who was instrumental in both these examples is now up for beatification!

Yet, at the very same time that Cardinal O’Brien is claiming religion is being marginalised, we have a Prime Minister endorsing the “enormous contribution” of Christian values to Britain (as the ink is barely dry on his oh-so-Christian attack on immigration) and inviting senior church officials to Downing Street whilst his Minister of Hate, Baroness Warsi, takes a break from her belief-excused homophobia to remind us that the coalition do indeed “do God”. And we have a Deputy Prime Minister who, before the election, told us rather sheepishly that he is “not a believer”, but has now conceded that it is somehow okay for 26 senior Bishops to continue to legislate in a reformed House of Lords. (These Lords Spiritual have been especially disgraceful in their attacks on proposed legislation towards assisted death and their opposition to equality legislation, particularly that which hammers at some of their entrenched doctrines of discrimination on the grounds of gender and sexual orientation.) Is such political influence really evidence of marginalisation in society?

The Easter messages of Christian tolerance have also included the Catholic Archbishop of Westminster, Vincent Nichols, suggesting that atheists such as myself are more likely to see “killing oneself or a loved one” as a “beguiling temptation”. He then claimed “We [people of faith] know better because we live these truths of faith”! The arrogance and vitriol in this speech are all the worse for them coming from someone who is claimed as a moral leader. And when over two thirds of religious people support a change in the law (British Attitudes Survey, 2010), for him to claim otherwise is a lie, pure and simple. Some moral leadership.

O’Brien, Nichols and other faith peddlers need to recognise the society they live in. The UK can no longer be described as “Christian”, no matter how much they inveigle themselves into our political decision-making and gain unchallenged public platforms to spout their nastiness and have it regurgitated by the conservative media that smells a good opportunity to knock equalities (the hysteria of ex-Archbishop Carey screeching “it’s political correctness gone mad” and Lord Patten, new Chairman (sic) of the BBC, pompously claiming that "some of the arguments put forward by secularists against the Pope's visit were lacking in intellectualism and were extraordinarily mean-spirited" this week are beyond satire).

If recognising and protecting the equal rights of all people in this country, and pushing to separate our legislature from those who believe in unprovable mystical beings, and seeking legislation to enable individuals who so choose, to be able to end terminal suffering with a caring medical intervention is regarded as “taking God out of the square” and the stance of an “enemy”, then O’Brien can now be content he has one in me.